boy briefs: empowering or conforming?

The notion of underwear as outwear is not a new notion. In fact, it originates as far back as the 15th century, occurring within menswear in the Middle Ages. Indeed, the introduction of corsets in the 16th century allowed the idea of underwear as a fashionable style for women to erupt, the French court endorsing the idea of accentuating a women's figure (wow we love men dictating how a women should look).

Looking at the past world of fashion, and their trends or norms, it is clear that what is deemed socially acceptable, or perhaps provocative in fashion is forever fluctuating. Cyclical trends continue to keep reinventing themselves, often driven by the society and social environment around them. With this in mind, it is interesting to consider the recent trend of 'brief biker shorts', and where this sits in the realm of femininity, male-gaze and social constructs.

The trend of 'boyfriend-boxer' style (which I use loosely, for it seems an official name is yet to be defined), has covered my social media in the past few months. The trend, which I personally began noticing pre-COVID days has circulated through celebrities, influencers and everyday people, and it's popularity, or perhaps publicity is one which leaves a lot of questions.

Whilst you may argue that you simply don't think about what your clothing means when you put it on, it is undeniable that you are accepting a certain image with certain pieces of clothing, putting out certain messages or beliefs. That is what fashion is- a method of communication and whether you consciously choose to or not, through your clothes you communicate.

I believe that the trend of boxer biker shorts can be read either two ways, and it is perhaps this divided reading which confuses me more.

Wearing biker shorts, or even leggings which are inspired by the design of boy's boxers could be interpreted as a fashion statement which caters to the male gaze. Indeed, is it not but a reshaping of the idea, or should I say image of a woman walking around in a boy's collared shirt and boxers? The idea of women wearing boys underwear is socially considered sexual, so by wearing shorts inspired by their design, are there not similar connotations. An interesting theory to consider.

In a complete contrast, wearing these shorts could also be interpreted as a rejection of the social feminine constructs, embracing the classic statement of 'well if a boy can do it, why can't I?'. Perhaps they fall into the idea of gender-free clothing, suggesting a future in which clothes don't fall into a category of male or female.

So we are left at a standstill, are the shorts empowering and rejecting social norms, or simply finding an alternative way to cater to them? What do you think?

Either way, I think it's important to remember that your instagrammable shorts say more than just 'I'm cool and up to date with the trends'. Interpret each piece of clothing as you may, but they have the power or volume to comment on social issues and project not only who you are, but what you stand for.

Until next time,

O